103 Now exhibit 45 shows that the device ID number is 358960061307271 and from exhibit 36/1 which is the seizure list dt. 21/7/17 one Moto mobile having model no. XT1635-02 (mat exhibit 8) was seized and there the IMEI number is mentioned 358960061307271 and the device id in short IMEI number also matches with the same IMEI number which exhibit 45 shows. So, the device ID of the mobile phone matches. The mobile phone had been seized by P.W. 17 and the P.W. 14 identified his signature in the seizure list which P.W. 17 had proved the seizure list. There is nothing in the cross examination or other evidences that there was so search and seizure. The HP laptop (mat exhibit 7) of the accused and the two sim cards one of Vodafone (mat exhibit 8/5) and Jio (mat exhibit 8/6) along with the SD card of 16 GB (mat exhibit 8/7) were also seized and P.W. 17 had proved it that he had seized it. The IMEI number of a mobile phone is something that cannot be manufactured and this number is given only at the time of manufacturing of the device by the manufacturer and no plea had been taken from the defense side that the IMEI no. had been manufactured or tampered and as this device ID matches with the same device ID which Reliance Jio Infocomm had provided and as well as the mobile number 8240136385 and thus court can safely presume that through this mat exhibit 8 the nude pictures and videos of P.W. 1 were uploaded in the website www.pornhub.com and this device was seized from the possession of this accused Animesh Boxi and thus this accused had uploaded the videos. Moreover this court finds from exhibit 7/6 that email id animeshbokshi18@gmail.com is registered with that pornhub account through which the nude videos of P.W. 1 had been uploaded and this court already holds that it is Animesh Boxi who created the email id animeshbokshi18@gmail.com . In this context Ld. Special PP referred a citation Amitsingh Bhikamsingh Thakur vs. State of Maharashtra 2007 (1)SCC (Cri)582 where it was held that “Discovery of fact inconsequence of information received from accused – requirements of S. 27 stated – “Facts discovered” also includes mental fact such as the place from which the object is produced and knowledge of accused to this – only that portion of the information which relates to the fact discovered is admissible” and argued that here the uploaded video, uploaded through his pornhub account