76 Examination Report no. is mentioned as CFSL(K)/EE/2017/FED/WB/1548/P-3184 and from exhibit 39 it appears it is in connection with Panskura P.S. case no. 381/17 and on the “Description of Exhibits” it is clearly stated about the details of exhibit C, exhibit D, exhibit E, exhibits G1 to G9 and exhibit H which P.W. 18 had sent to CFSL duly forwarded by Ld. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tamluk, Purba Medinipur. On careful perusal of exhibit 39 this court finds the exact URL links which are mentioned in the certificates u/s 65 B of the Indian Evidence Act (exhibits 23/4, 27/6 to 27/11 and 42) and which P.W. 18 also stated in his examination in chief and the details of the file names. From exhibit 39 this court further finds it is written that the girl who is present in “Exhibit H” was found to be same in exhibits C, D, E and also with the exhibits G1 to G9. This court further finds from the said report that the video fileds “victim’s name daughter of victim’s father name (victim’s father another name) – Pornhub.com of the exhibit C with the other video files contained in exhibit D and E and the girls present in the photographs as exhibits G1 to G9 was found to be same. This report had been duly signed by Dr. P. Paul Ramesh along with seal (exhibits 39/1 to 39/6). Now from exhibit 40 this court finds that it is a forwarding letter by the Director, CFSL addressed to Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tamluk, Purba Medinipur (exhibit 40) and exhibit 41 shows the forensic examination report where it is mentioned about all the URL links and the necessary details in it and duly signed along with seal (exhibits 41/1 to 41/5). Now, P.W. 1 in the written complaint (exhibit 1) mentioned about the alleged link as in www.pornhub.com (The detailed URL link is not mentioned in this judgment by this court to protect the privacy of the victim) and even in her evidence also stated that the website name is pornhub and the link is big but the last three digits of the said link is 224 and this court finds the last three digits of the URL as stated in exhibit 1 is 224 which exactly P.W. 1 stated in her evidence. The witness P.W. 11 also stated in his evidence that Animesh Boxi showed the “URL” where he had uploaded the nude pictures and video of his lover victim in the computer as provided by his office and the search words which Animesh Boxi used as a specific unique string was “victim’s name daughter of victim’s father name” and the first search result was shown and on the first pop up the domain which was