105 given the title caption and this implies how much of anger and hate the accused has got as because this court already hold that this accused had uploaded the videos through his mobile phone. Thus the concept of revenge porn comes into play. Definition of revenge porn: Sexually explicit images of a person posted online without that person's consent especially as a form of revenge or harassment. Revenge porn or revenge pornography is the sexually explicit portrayal of one or more people that is distributed without their consent via any medium. The sexually explicit images or video may be made by a partner of an intimate relationship with the knowledge and consent of the subject, or it may be made without his or her knowledge. The possession of the material may be used by the perpetrators to blackmail the subjects into performing other sex acts, to coerce them into continuing the relationship, or to punish them for ending the relationship. In this context Ld. Special PP referred a citation Mohd. Ajmal Amir vs State of Maharashtra (2012)3 SCC (Cri) 481 where it was held that “Reliable ocular evidence is the best evidence. And when the confession of an accused gets support from the statements of eyewitnesses, it is not necessary to refer to other evidences” and argued that here everyone including the victim girl who had seen the obscene video in the pornhub and other online computer resources containing sexually explicit materials are actually eye witnesses. In this case it cannot be denied that victim is unknown to the accused Animesh Boxi otherwise the question of marriage was not put to the cross examination of P.W. 1. Moreover, P.W. 1 refused to go for outing with the accused and for this the accused had uploaded those without her consent. P.W. 1 had been subject to grilling cross examination but there is nothing in her cross examination. This court already hold that the accused knew P.W. 1 very well and according to P.W. 1 there was love affairs with the accused and P.W. 1 and even the question regarding marriage was put at the time of cross examination of P.W. 1 so this court can come into conclusion that there was close relationship in between P.W. 1 and the accused Animesh Boxi and then it is high chance that this accused can easily get the mobile phone of P.W. 1. The revenge has been established by proving that