22
mobile phone and then the accused had uploaded those nude
pictures of her daughter in different porn websites and he came to
know about this from his bhaipo (nephew) who came to their home
and told them and after hearing this her daughter was broken and
came to know from his daughter as well. P.W. 2 further stated that
with her daughter he went to the P.S. in the evening time of
21/7/2017 and as her daughter was broken so she dictated and he
had written the complaint and it was read over to his daughter and
her daughter had also seen it and then her daughter put her
signature into it. P.W. 2 identified the written complaint (exhibit 1) and
stated that it was written as per her daughter’s instructions and it
bears the signature of her daughter and identified his signature
(exhibit 1/2) on the written complaint. P.W. 2 also stated that he was
examined by the police. P.W. 2 further stated that on 07/8/17 he went
to CID office along with her daughter and there the mobile phone of
her daughter was seized by the CID and he had signed on the seizure
list and knew the contents of the seizure list and identified his
signature (exhibit 4/1). P.W. 2 identified his signature on the label
(mat exhibit 1/2) and the mobile phone of his daughter. P.W. 2 also
stated that in the CID office women police officer examined her
daughter and took her daughter’s consent for taking her pictures and
then her daughter and he had given the consent to it and identified
his signature (exhibit 5/1) on the paper for giving consent and also
identified the signature of her daughter (exhibit 5/2). P.W. 2 identified
the pictures of her daughter in exhibits 1/4, 1/5 and 1/6.
P.W. 3 happens to be the constable number 573 posted at CID,
Cyber Crime Cell who stated before this court that he knew the
incident of 19/8/17 and on that day Barun Kumar Nayek (P.W. 11) Sub
Inspector of Cyber Crime Cell downloaded the email data which had
been received in the official email of CID, Cyber Crime Cell and the
official email address is occyber.cid-wb@gov.in from Google and
Pornhub and the case reference for which the data had been
downloaded is in connection with Panskura P.S. case No. 381/17 and
then the downloaded articles had been printed and Barun babu gave
the said document to the I.O. of this case Atanu Santra (P.W. 18) who
seized it and he was present at that time. P.W. 3 identified his
signature along with date (exhibit 6) in the seizure list and he had
signed into it after reading and understanding its content. P.W. 3
Seleccionar párrafo de destino3
Conectar a un párrafo
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Añadir a la tabla de contenidos