O  R  D  E  R 1. Again, this Court is called upon to address a very important but a sensitive issue on national security and human rights, wherein we have   to   ensure   that  national   security   and   human   rights   can   be reasonably   and   defensibly   balanced,   a   responsibility,   that   this Court takes with utmost seriousness. 2. This   Court,  vide  its   earlier   judgment   dated   10.01.2020   in Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India, (2020) SCC Online SC 25, gave certain directions regarding the imposition of restrictions on the internet in a proportionate manner. The aforesaid case had, in addition to the procedural rules, supplemented the requirements of having   timely   review   and   the   non­permanence   of   internet shutdown orders. 3. The   three   Petitioners   before   us   are   aggrieved   by   the   fact   that Respondent No. 1 has restricted the mobile internet speed to 2G and have approached this Court seeking 4G mobile internet, and the   quashing   of   the  impugned   orders  restricting   internet   in   the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir.  2

Seleccionar párrafo de destino3