由此 - 30 - A B 109. Paragraph 1) of the fax asks about the LBMA membership revocation. It would have been fairer to inform ARY that Mr. Lintner was C A B C intending to portray this as the result of investigations of relevant D E F G authorities into money laundering, terrorist-financing and drug trafficking by ARY and the ARY Group. 110. Paragraph 2) on the face of it has little to do with the Dubai gold trade. Mr. Lintner, it seems to me, should have indicated to ARY that D E F G he was intending to use the Zardari case as corroborative of ARY’s alleged H involvement in money laundering, terrorist financing and drug trafficking. I I 111. J K H Paragraph 3) is impossible to answer. I am not sure how ARY could know what movements of gold were being scrutinised by which US investigators. What specific movements did Mr. Lintner have in mind? J K These are not specified. The question lacks particularity. It is also unclear L just what connection the question has with the Dubai gold trade. M M 112. N O L Third, there is nothing in the fax asking for comment on ARY’s alleged involvement with a number of other matters raised in the N Article: AQK; local tribes in the Afghan-Pakistani border; the use of O “hawala” for criminal purposes; Mr. Basra; money laundering through P Q Digital UK; and Mr. Iqbal Mirchi. No opportunity was given to ARY to comment on the grave allegations which the Article was going to raise on P Q these topics. R R S 113. Fourth, the fax was casually written and faxed to ARY S Traders’ number. It could simply (and reasonably) have been ignored as a T crank letter. Far greater effort ought to have been made to bring to ARY’s T U U V V