and who would fire him. Mr. Kasakula revealed that he got the information from the 1st Respondent’s brother in- law by the name of Mr. Kasuba who told him all this at a drinking place called Chief Chisunka’s bar at the market. According to PW1 that mode of communication was intimidation because there was no way he could be limited to talking Only to Certain pCOplC. PW1 also told him that they should do what they wanted because he was not employed by the 1st Respondent or anyone else. 13. It was his further evidence that on another day, after interacting with Mr. Moses Kasakula, he went to a barbershop in the market where he met a young man who also threatened him. He was told that “we have heard you are ‘de-campaigning’ the Patriotic Front and specifically Honourable David Maburriba”. The young man then told him that he had the 1st Respondent’s number and threatened to call him, but when PW1 dared him to call, the young man said “Sir, I am just joking”. 14. In cross examination by Mr. Banda, when asked if he felt intimidated during the election period, PW1 confirmed that he felt intimidated. When questioned if he was intimidated by the 1 ^Respondent he respondent that he was not intimidated by the lsL Respondent or by the 1st Respondent’s registered agents. 15. Cross examined further by Mr. Mutale, he conceded that he did not know the number of votes the 1st Respondent polled although he confirmed that the 1st Respondent was declared winner of the parliamentary election for Mwense Constituency. Jii