Case 1:14-cv-09763-VM Document 44 Filed 08/28/15 Page 6 of 35 v. Holder, 665 F. Supp. 2d 426 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) ("Doe III"), the Court found the Mukasey standard satisfied. held that ~good a reason" existed to The court believe that "disclosure may result in a harm related to an authorized ongoing investigation to protect against international terrorism or clandestine intelligence activities," and that the "link between disclosure ~at substantial." Following Doe and the risk of harm [was] 432. _.!_g, Merrill moved for partial reconsideration of Doe III as it applied to the Attachment. See Doe v. Holder, 703 F. Supp. 2d 313 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) ( "J::)C)e IV" l . The Court granted the motion in part and denied it in Court part, found ordering that certain information two categories of the Attachment should be disclosed: disclosed. The material contained in (1) material within the scope of what the NSL statute identifies as permissible for the FBI to obtain through the use of NSLs, and (2) material that the FBI has publicly acknowledged requested by means of NSLs. ~ee ~ it at 316. has previously The Court was •not persuaded that disclosure of these two categories of information would raise a substantial risk that any of the statutorily enumerated harms would occur.• ~ As to the rest of the Attachment, the Court found that the Government - 6