10 WPA (P) 104 of 2022 and Others reported in (2010) 6 SCC 614 but that was a case where the reasons assigned in the impugned order was supplemented by subsequent material to suspend the cancellation of examination on the serious allegation of mass copying, but the said judgment was rendered in different fact situation. Hence, considering the reasons mentioned above and prima facie conclusion that the impugned order under Section 144 of the Cr.P.C has been passed without authority of law and taking note of the requirement of Section 5(2) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, the Rules of 2017, the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Anuradha Bhasin (supra) and People’s Union For Civil Liberties (PUCL) (supra) and also the fact that the reason now put forward for issuing the impugned order are not contained in the impugned order and that the State has various other means available to prevent use of unfair means in the Madhyamik Examination and that the prima-facie test of proportionality is not satisfied, we are of the view that a case of grant of interim relief is made out. Hence, we direct that the operation of the impugned order dated 03rd of March, 2022 shall remain stayed until further orders. We make it clear that this order will not come in the way of the State authorities in taking other