CYRILLA: Global Digital Rights Law

CYRILLA: Global Digital Rights Law

- Colección
- Registrarse

ordenado por

Fecha de creación

69 relaciones, 67 Entidades

Seleccionar párrafo de destino3

● ● ●

Uwazi es desarrollado por
CYRILLA: Global Digital Rights Law
Colección
Acceder

Información
69relaciones

Biancardi v. Italy

Case Law

Consejos de búsqueda

Buscar texto

Type something in the search box to get some results.

Tabla de Contenidos

Sin Tabla de Contenidos

Sin descripción de Tabla de Contenidos

Biancardi v. Italy

Case Law

Country

Italy

Country Location

Latitud: 42.82063999428387

Longitud: 12.730955243111072

Country Location (vinculado Case Law): Italy

Decision Date: 25 nov 2021

Case Status: Cerrado

Case Outcome (Procedural)

Admissible

Case Outcome (Disposition)

Law or Action Upheld

Keywords

Data Protection and Retention
Defamation / Reputation
Digital Rights
Freedom of Press
Privacy
Right to be Forgotten

Judicial Body: European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)

Court Name: European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)

Case Number: 77419/16

Case Summary: The European Court of Human Rights unanimously decided that de-indexing requests against online publishers can be successful and in the present case, did not violate the publisher’s freedom of expression protected by Article 10. The applicant was an editor-in-chief of an online newspaper that published an article describing a fight at a restaurant and the criminal proceedings that ensued. The person described in the article requested the applicant to remove and de-index the article which was not granted. The Italian courts held that by not de-indexing the article, the publisher had made the article easily accessible online for a significant period and violated the applicant’s right to reputation protected by Article 8. The ECtHR upheld the decision. It also upheld the non-pecuniary damages granted to the applicant against the editor, in consideration of the sensitive nature of the personal data published. It found that publishing supplementary or clarificatory information would be insufficient to balance the applicant’s right’s under Article 8 against the publisher’s rights under Article 10.

Case Significance: The decision contracts freedom of expression. The Court clarified that de-indexing requests are not limited to search engines and can be brought against news publishers, including journalists, maintaining online archives. The court considered factors such as sensitivity of the data published, the private nature of the applicant, the fact that the article was not updated and that the request was for de-indexing, not removal, to conclude that the applicants right to reputation under Article 8 outweighed the applicants right to publish information under Article 10.

Jacob van de Kerkhof, writing for Strasbourg Observers, further noted that the judgment widens the scope of the right to be forgotten weighing in favor of the right to private life over the right to freedom of expression when the case concerns de-indexation. “That weight is reinforced by a seemingly shorter period in which an article can be considered ‘newsworthy’, especially when the claimant is relatively unknown to the public.”

The decision establishes a binding or persuasive precedent within its jurisdiction.

Related Caselaw

Big Brother Watch v. The United Kingdom
Delfi AS v. Estonia
Google LLC v. National Commission on Informatics and Liberty (CNIL)
Google Spain SL v. Agencia Española de Protección de Datos
Kablis v. Russia
Savva Terentyev v. Russia

Source Name and URL: Global Freedom of Expression

Collection

Columbia

Date Updated: 3 jul 2024

Documentos primarios

Judgment
English
Descargar Ver

Sin referencias

References are parts of this document related with other documents and entities.

Country1
- Country1
Related Case Law66
- Case Law66
No existe etiqueta2
- Case Law1
- Analysis1

Crear Referencia

Seleccionar tipo de relación

Original Law Cited
Related Translation
Related Media Source
Country
Related Law
Related Regulations
Related Secondary Law
Related Amendments
Related Draft Amendments
Related Case Law
Related Analysis

Consejos de búsqueda

Añadir entidades / documentos

Consejos de búsqueda

Notificaciones

Estás al día

La actividad nueva se mostrará aquí.