WWW.LIVELAW.IN W.P(C).No.19716/2019-L 9 the mobile phone; the 5 th respondent submitted Ext.R4(e) complaint to the 4 th respondent explaining the humiliation she suffered from the petitioner's father; it is stated that her father came to the college on 05.07.2019 and shouted at the 4 th respondent in front of the students, parents and other teachers waiting for admission procedure, accusing them for having banned the usage of the mobile phone in the modern age; despite all these, the 4 th respondent did not take any stringent action against her; the 4 th respondent instructed the 5th respondent to inform the petitioner that she can either choose to follow the instruction or to leave the hostel in case she is not willing to abide by the instructions. It is stated that the petitioner had given wide publicity to the incident accusing the college authorities for having asked her to vacate the hostel for using mobile phone. It is stated that in the meeting held on 08.07.2019, all other inmates of the hostel, except the petitioner agreed to surrender the mobile phones between 6 p.m and 10 p.m; therefore, she was given 2 days' time to inform her final decision; It is stated that out of the 44 students in the hostel excluding the 4 students, who are studying for B.Ed course/who are on leave, all the remaining 39 students agreed to abide by the instructions and to surrender the mobile phone between 6 p.m and 10 p.m. The 4 th respondent stated that the petitioner was not asked to vacate the hostel within 12 hours as alleged. It is also stated that as per Ext.R4(g) minutes of the executive meeting of the PTA held on 12.07.2019, it was decided to implement the restriction imposing the usage of the mobile phone. It is also stated that her parent behaved rudely with the Vice President of the PTA also who was deputed to talk to