lawsuits were consolidated by the Multi-District Litigation panel and assigned to Judge Sue Robinson of the District of Delaware. This appeal is from the District Court’s dismissal of that consolidated case. The consolidated case was presented to the District Court as a putative class action, and four named plaintiffs— our appellants here—filed a consolidated class action complaint. The putative class consists of: all persons in the United States of America who used the Apple Safari or Microsoft Internet Explorer web browsers and who visited a website from which doubleclick.net (Google’s advertising serving service), PointRoll, Vibrant Media, Media Innovation Group, or WPP cookies were deployed as part of a scheme to circumvent the users’ browsers’ settings to block such cookies and which were thereby used to enable tracking of the class members[’] [i]nternet communications without consent.13 The complaint asserts three federal law claims against all defendants. Count I claims violation of the federal Wiretap Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2510 et seq. Count II claims violation of the Stored Communications Act, 18 U.S.C § 2701. And Count III claims violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1030. 13 Compl. ¶ 191. 12