Anterior 1 / 12 Próximo

JURISPRUDENCIA Roj: STS 2918/2020 - ECLI:ES:TS:2020:2918 Id Cendoj: 28079130032020100222 Órgano: Tribunal Supremo. Sala de lo Contencioso Sede: Madrid Sección: 3 Fecha: 17/09/2020 Nº de Recurso: 2099/2019 Nº de Resolución: 1176/2020 Procedimiento: Recurso de Casación Contencioso-Administrativo (L.O. 7/2015) Ponente: MARIA ISABEL PERELLO DOMENECH Tipo de Resolución: Sentencia Resoluciones del caso: SAN, Sala de lo Contencioso-Administrativo, Sección 1ª, 27-12-2018 (rec. 544/2017), ATS 7376/2019, STS 2918/2020 TRIBUNALSUPREMO Sala de lo Contencioso-Administrativo Sección Tercera Sentencia núm. 1.176/2020 Fecha de sentencia: 17/09/2020 Tipo de procedimiento: R. CASACION Número del procedimiento: 2099/2019 Fallo/Acuerdo: Fecha de Votación y Fallo: 30/06/2020 Ponente: Excma. Sra. D.ª María Isabel Perelló Doménech Procedencia: AUD.NACIONAL SALA C/A. SECCION 1 Letrado de la Administración de Justicia: Ilmo. Sr. D. Luis Martín Contreras Transcrito por: BPM Nota: R. CASACION núm.: 2099/2019 Ponente: Excma. Sra. D.ª María Isabel Perelló Doménech Letrado de la Administración de Justicia: Ilmo. Sr. D. Luis Martín Contreras TRIBUNAL SUPREMO Sala de lo Contencioso-Administrativo Sección Tercera Sentencia núm. 1176/2020 Excmos. Sres. y Excma. Sra. D. Eduardo Espín Templado, presidente 1

Seleccionar párrafo de destino3

● ● ●

Don Dionisio v. Google

Case Law

Country

Spain

Country Location

Latitud: 40.17158238163279

Longitud: -3.6606463193890733

Country Location (vinculado Case Law): Spain

Decision Date: 17 sept 2020

Case Status: Cerrado

Case Outcome (Procedural)

Affirmed Lower Court

Keywords

Access to Information
Data Protection and Retention
Filtering and Blocking
Privacy
Right to be Forgotten
Search Engines

Judicial Body: Corte Suprema [corte de última instancia/casación]

Court Name: Third Section of the Administrative Chamber of the Supreme Tribunal of Spain

Case Number: STS 2918/2020

Case Summary: The Third Section of the Administrative Chamber of the Supreme Tribunal of Spain decided that the right to be forgotten does not grant the right to get articles that impose criminal accusations de-indexed, even when the criminal investigation was closed without a guilty verdict. Don Dionisio, CEO of an important company, was the subject of news reports regarding criminal allegations of espionage to members of the company’s Administration Board. The criminal investigations were eventually closed. Don Dionisio urged Google to take measures to prevent his name from appearing in search results in relationship to this negative coverage, which Google refused. The Supreme Tribunal decided that the right to information of users prevailed over Don Dionisio’s right to be forgotten, since the contested information was of public interest and relevant. The Court also considered that maintaining the information indexed in the search engine didn’t breach the presumption of innocence of the appellant.

Case Significance: Through this decision the Supreme Tribunal of Spain expands freedom of expression by denying the right to be forgotten regarding the publication of news related to closed criminal investigations without a guilty verdict, thus giving special prevalence to freedom of information. The judgement recognized that facts about private actors in charge of large economic interests are of public interest and that the internet users’ right to freedom of information is key for democratic life.

The decision establishes a binding or persuasive precedent within its jurisdiction.

Related Caselaw

Source Name and URL: Global Freedom of Expression

Collection

Columbia

Date Updated: 3 jul 2024

Documentos primarios

Judgment (in Spanish)
Spanish
Descargar Ver

CYRILLA: Global Digital Rights Law

Seleccionar párrafo de destino3

Don Dionisio v. Google

Documentos primarios

Notificaciones