Anterior 2 / 36 Próximo

Can Yeginsu and Anthony Jones for the Second Intervener (intervening by written submissions only) Hearing dates : 08 & 09/12/2015 --------------------- Approved Judgment

Seleccionar párrafo de destino3

● ● ●

R (on application of Miranda) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2016] EWCA Civ 6) (19 January 2016)

Case Law

Country

United Kingdom

Country Location

Latitud: 52.32950805122076

Longitud: -1.4047851562500706

Country Location (vinculado Case Law): United Kingdom

Decision Date: 19 ene 2016

Case Status: Cerrado

Case Outcome (Procedural)

Affirmed Lower Court

Case Outcome (Disposition)

Law or Action Overturned or Deemed Unconstitutional

Keywords

Data Protection and Retention
Media/Press
Surveillance
Terrorism

Judicial Body: Appellate Court

Case Number: 2016 EWCA Civ 6

Case Summary: David Miranda, the partner of Glenn Greenwald, the journalist renowned for breaking the Edward Snowden story, was questioned at Heathrow airport had encrypted storage devices seized under paragraph 2(1) of Schedule 7 to the Terrorism Act 2000 (“TACT”). Miranda filed a complaint arguing that this action was unlawful. The England and Wales Court of Appeal ruled that paragraph 2(1) of Schedule 7 to the Terrorism Act 2000 (“TACT”) was not compatible with Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR” or “Convention”) because it did not provide adequate safeguards against its arbitrary exercise.

Case Significance: The decision establishes a binding or persuasive precedent within its jurisdiction.

Source Name and URL: Columbia Global Freedom of Expression

Collection

CIPIT

Date Updated: 11 may 2024

Documentos primarios

miranda-v-home-sec-judgment.pdf
English
Descargar Ver

CYRILLA: Global Digital Rights Law

Seleccionar párrafo de destino3

R (on application of Miranda) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2016] EWCA Civ 6) (19 January 2016)

Documentos primarios

Notificaciones