- 40 A B A 95. Given that the Subject Mobile Phones have already been B returned to the applicant without any search of their contents, it does not C D E F serve any useful purpose to quash the Decision. I therefore would not make any order to that extent. 96. C D The applicant is partially successful in the application. Considering the substance of all the arguments raised, I think it is fair and E F just to award two-thirds of the costs to the applicant, to be taxed if not G H agreed with certificate for two counsel. Given that the interested parties’ submissions generally and materially overlap with the applicant’s G H submissions, I do not think it is justified and fair in the present I J circumstances to order two sets of costs against the Commissioner. I would therefore make no order as to costs as between the interested parties and the Commissioner. K L I J The applicant and the 2nd interested party’s own costs shall also be taxed in accordance with legal aid regulations. These costs orders are on a nisi basis, and shall become K L absolute 14 days from today unless any of the parties applies by summons M M to vary it. N O N 97. I thank counsel’s helpful assistance in the matter. O P P Q Q R S (Thomas Au) Judge of the Court of First Instance High Court R S T T U U V V