1. An order against the respondent for discovery of information including relevant documents in possession of the Judicial Service Commission regarding the purported nomination or otherwise of Justice Steven Kavuma as Deputy Chief Justice of Uganda to be produced expeditiously to enable the applicants to pursue a petition in the Supreme Court. 2. Costs of the application be provided for by the respondent. The application is supported by the affidavit of Kiiza Eron the second applicant which briefly depones that: 1. The applicants filed Misc. Cause No. 2 of 2015 in the Supreme Court of Uganda challenging the appointment of Justice Steven Kavuma as Deputy Chief Justice of Uganda. 2. The Judicial Service Commission has failed or refused to provide the applicants information in their possession regarding the nomination by the Judicial Service Commission of Justice Steven Kavuma as Deputy Chief Justice. 3. Several members of the Judicial Service Commission have informed the applicants that such information and documents are in possession of the Judicial Service Commission. 4. The applicants have written several letters to the Judicial Service Commission requesting for information regarding the candidature of Justice Steven Kavuma without success. 5. The documents in possession of the respondents are vital in facilitating the applicants challenging the appointment of Justice Steven Kavuma as Deputy Chief Justice of Uganda. 6. It is fair, just and equitable that this court grants the application and issues orders for the production of the information regarding the candidature of the third respondent. In its affidavit in reply, deponed by Richard Adrole, a State Attorney in the Attorney General’s Chambers. The 1st respondent averred that there is no pending suit before this court from which this application arises. That paragraph 4 and 5 of the application are premised on speculation and hearsay evidence. That this application is incompetent, frivolous, vexatious, barred in law and a 2

Seleccionar párrafo de destino3