2023:DHC:2796 24.7. The NFT Player Cards used on the Striker platform do not suggest any kind of endorsement or association of a player with the Striker platform. The Striker platform uses Digital Player Cards for all current players. The game by its very nature requires that each and every player be represented. 24.8. The use of the players’ information on their NFT Player Cards by Striker does not cause any loss of earning opportunities for the players (plaintiffs no. 2 to 6). 24.9. No case of unjust enrichment by the defendant no. 2 has been made out as the only player related content used by defendant no.2 is the information available in public domain, in respect of which no person can claim proprietary rights. 24.10.The present suit has been filed by making material concealments and false statements in the plaint. The plaintiffs have wrongly stated that they came to know of the Striker platform in January, 2023, whereas they knew about the Striker platform since September, 2022 as is evidenced on the screenshots of the WhatsApp conversations between the employees of the plaintiffs and the defendants. 24.11.The plaintiff has concealed in the plaint that the plaintiff themselves run a fantasy game with Digital Player Cards similar to that run by the defendant no.2. Therefore, the present suit is an attempt to stymie competition. 24.12.The balance of convenience is in favour of the defendants and against the plaintiffs. The grant of interim injunction would cause irreparable harm and injury to the defendants inasmuch as it would result in Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AMIT BANSAL CS(COMM) 108/2023 Signing Date:26.04.2023 Page 18 of 51 13:09:16