2023:DHC:2796 passing off); (ii) unjust enrichment; (iii) tortious or unlawful interference with economic interest of the plaintiffs; and, (iv) breach of personality rights of plaintiffs no.2 to 6. Besides the relief of permanent injunction, the plaintiffs have also sought the relief of rendition of accounts and damages. REPLY FILED ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT NO.1 20. In the reply filed on behalf of the defendant no.1 to the application for grant of interim injunction, the case made out by the defendant no.1 is as under: 20.1. The defendant no.1 operates an online gaming platform, MPL, which also includes OFS. The MPL platform of the defendant no.1 hosts games developed by third-party game developers, including the gaming application developed by the defendant no.2 under the name Striker. 20.2. The defendant no.2 is a separate and independent corporate entity and defendant no.1 is not involved in managing the day-to-day affairs of the defendant no.2. 20.3. While the allegations in the plaint are specific only to the mobile application Striker, which is owned and operated by the defendant no.2, the prayers in the plaint as well as the interim application are towards seeking restrain on the operation of all OFS games hosted on the MPL platform of the defendant no.1. 20.4. The plaintiff no.1 has concealed the fact that they run an OFS game titled “D3.Club,” which is similar to the OFS game offered by the defendant no.2. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AMIT BANSAL CS(COMM) 108/2023 Signing Date:26.04.2023 Page 9 of 51 13:09:16