GLUKHIN v. RUSSIA JUDGMENT In the case of Glukhin v. Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Pere Pastor Vilanova, President, Jolien Schukking, Yonko Grozev, Georgios A. Serghides, Peeter Roosma, Andreas Zünd, Oddný Mjöll Arnardóttir, judges, and Milan Blaško, Section Registrar, Having regard to: the application (no. 11519/20) against the Russian Federation lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Russian national, Mr Nikolay Sergeyevich Glukhin (“the applicant”), on 31 January 2020; the decision to give notice to the Russian Government (“the Government”) of the complaints concerning Article 6 § 1 and Articles 8 and 10 of the Convention, and to declare inadmissible the remainder of the application; the observations submitted by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicant; the comments submitted by Article 19, which was granted leave to intervene by the President of the Section; the respondent Government’s failure to submit observations in reply to the third-party observations and the lack of any communication from the respondent Government since March 2022; the decision of the President of the Section to appoint one of the sitting judges of the Court to act as an ad hoc judge, applying by analogy Rule 29 § 2 of the Rules of the Court (see, for an explanation of the background for this, Kutayev v. Russia, no. 17912/15, §§ 5-8, 24 January 2023); Having deliberated in private on 23 May and 13 June 2023, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on the lastmentioned date: INTRODUCTION 1. The case concerns the applicant’s administrative conviction for his failure to notify the authorities of his intention to hold a solo demonstration using a “quickly (de)assembled object”. During the investigation the police used facial recognition technology to process the applicant’s personal data. 1