I-Admin (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Hong Ying Ting 10 [2020] SGCA 32 On 2 July 2013, after reviewing the results of these investigations, the appellant commenced Suit 585/2013 and applied for an Anton Pillar order (“APO”) against the first to fourth respondents. The APO was granted on 9 July 2013 and executed on 17 July 2013 at the third respondent’s premises. It is undisputed that on this latter date, the first and second respondents deleted files from the first respondent’s Lenovo Thinkpad laptop (the “Thinkpad”) and the Dell Server (see GD at [14]) The Nexia forensics team recovered these files during its review of the devices. Prior to the APO’s execution, the following materials were stored on the Dell Server: (a) Three folders titled “From Zaza”, “Zaza_dev” and “Zaza/Testing”. These contained, among other things, the appellant’s source codes (these being files written in Java programming language which underlie the operation of the appellant’s software systems) as well as its client materials. (b) A Microsoft Excel (“Excel”) document titled “cpf.xls”. This contained the substance of the appellant’s CPF database, which documented relevant information pertaining to CPF statutory rules. 11 The following materials were stored on the Thinkpad: (a) An Excel document titled “payitem setup_iAdmin.xls”. This was one of the appellant’s databases, containing a list of payitems. (b) An Excel document titled “Copy of ePayroll eHR Pricing for all regions (04 Jan 2011).xls”. This contained the appellant’s pricing information and other business strategy material, including fees quoted for services rendered. 5