12 SMAJIĆ v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA DECISION imprisonment, suspended for a period of three years and his personal computer and a laptop were seized (see paragraph 5 above). In the circumstances of the present case, the Court does not find the penalties imposed to have been disproportionate. 41. Therefore, having regard to the circumstances of the present case, the Court considers that the interference with the applicant’s right to freedom of expression does not disclose any appearance of violation of Article 10 of the Convention. 42. Accordingly, this complaint is manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected, in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention. C. Other complaints 43. The Court examined the applicant’s remaining complaints under Articles 9 and 14 of the Convention. However, having regard to all the material in its possession, and in so far as these complaints fall within the Court’s jurisdiction, it finds that they do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention. It follows that these complaints must also be rejected as being manifestly ill-founded, pursuant to Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Declares the application inadmissible. Done in English and notified in writing on 8 February 2018. Andrea Tamietti Deputy Registrar Carlo Ranzoni President