99 captured her nude pictures and videos and P.W. 1 herself had stated it in her evidence. It is clear from the cross examination of P.W. 1 who stated that in her mobile phone there is no front camera but has got only back camera which is sufficient to hold that the mobile phone of P.W. 1 has got a camera to capture image and videos. Now this court already noticed from exhibit 7/6 the IP address is 47.15.15.236. The evidence of P.W. 16 is very vital in this case as P.W. 16 had produced certain vital documents in this case relation to the IP address 47.15.15.236. Ld. Special PP at the time of argument submitted that as soon an a computer/laptop/mobile phone is connected to the internet then through Internet Service Provider in short ISP the device is connected to the internet and as soon as the device is connected to the internet the ISP allocates a IP address for that device and further submitted that David W. Hagy of National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice, in his article named “Investigations Involving the Internet and Computer Networks” has observed the virtual investigation in the following ways: 1) Given an IP address and a date and time (including the time zone), most ISPs can identify the registered user assigned to the IP address at the specific time, enabling the investigator to request additional information. 2) Information that may be obtained from the ISP includes— a) Subscriber information such as the registered owner, address, and payment method. b) Transactional information such as connection times, dates, and IP address used. c) Content such as e-mail messages, data files, and stored programs. 3) Some of the information used in tracing an IP address or end user may be obtained from ISPs or network administrators. This information typically includes account information, e-mail address information, IP address, and domain name. It may or may not contain information about the owner or user and Ld. Special PP also stated four steps of traceability as