由此 - 24 - A B Article that ARY feared a court case bringing to light “more revealing details about his gold business that he would prefer to keep himself”. C D E 82. I think then that Section V gives rise to the meanings pleaded in SOC §§8(d), (g), (i) and (j). I do not think that there is any reliable A B C D E evidence supporting such meanings. The meanings are thus defamatory. F F G H (g) Section VI 83. Section VI gives an account of the growth of the gold market G H in Dubai. I I J 84. The section concludes in §15 by implying that ARY Traders J assisted Pakistani drug traffickers to launder money through the export of K L gold from Dubai to the UK. I say “implying” because this is not expressly stated. Instead, the suggestion is obliquely made through juxtaposing the K L 1st and 2nd sentences of §15 with the 3rd and 4th sentences of that M M paragraph. N N 85. O P Why (the reader asks himself) is there such a juxtaposition? The answer must be because the author of the Article wishes to suggest some connection between the export by ARY Traders of Euros 6.4 million O P of gold bars between October 2002 and December 2003 with the purchase Q R S T of exported gold by Pakistani drug traffickers masquerading as jewellers in the UK. Q R S 86. I think that the meanings pleaded in SOC §§8(e) and (g) are thus made out. There is no evidence whatsoever supporting the allegation T U U V V