Case 3:18-cv-06295-JD Document 19 Filed 06/18/19 Page 2 of 2
1
Because no further amendment could cure this problem, the amended complaint is
2
dismissed with prejudice with respect to the federal claim. Because only federal question
3
jurisdiction is alleged, Dkt. No. 10 ¶ 3, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction
4
over the alleged state negligence claim, and so dismisses it without prejudice. 28 U.S.C. §
5
1367(c)(3). All other pending motions are terminated.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 18, 2019
8
9
JAMES DONATO
United States District Judge
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2