Justice K.S.Puttaswamy(Retd) vs Union Of India on 26 September, 2018 interactions with the State. Mandating identification by only one highly intrusive mode is excessive, disproportionate and violates Articles 14, 19 and 21. Children: 70) As per the petitioners, there is no justification to include children in the Aadhaar programme for various reasons. 71) It may also be recorded at this juncture itself that insofar as the Aadhaar Act is concerned, following provisions thereof are specifically attacked as unconstitutional: (i) Section 2(c) and 2(d) - authentication and authentication record, read with Section 32 (ii) Section 2(h) read with Section 10 of CIDR (iii) Section 2(l) read with Regulation 23 of the Aadhaar (Enrolment and Updates) Regulation enrolling agency (iv) Section 2(v) - resident (v) Section 3 Aadhaar Number (vi) Section 5 Special treatment to children (vii) Section 6 Update of information (viii) Section 7 (ix) Section 8 (x) Section 9 (xi) Chapter IV Sections 11 to 23 (xii) Sections 23 and 54 excessive delegation (xiii) Section 23(2)(g) read with Chapter VI & VII Regulations 27 to 32 of the Aadhaar (Enrolment and Update) Regulations, (xiv) Section 29 (xv) Section 33 (xvi) Section 47 (xvii) Section 48 Power of Central Government to supersede UIDAI (xviii) Section 57 (xix) Section 59 Some Introductory Remarks: Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/127517806/ 46