CYRILLA: Global Digital Rights Law

CYRILLA: Global Digital Rights Law

- Bibliothèque
- S'identifier

Trié par

Date ajoutée

29 Relations, 25 Entités

Sélectionner le paragraphe cible3

● ● ●

Uwazi est développé par
CYRILLA: Global Digital Rights Law
Bibliothèque
Connexion

Info
29Relations

Bhasin v. Union of India

Case Law

Astuces de recherche

Recherche de texte

Type something in the search box to get some results.

Table des matières

Aucune table des matières

Aucune description de Table des matières

Bhasin v. Union of India

Case Law

Country

India

Country Location

Latitude: 23.078537445745496

Longitude: 78.60363571015989

Country Location (Lié Case Law): India

Decision Date: 10 janv. 2020

Case Status: Affaire Résolue

Case Outcome (Procedural)

Motion Granted

Case Outcome (Disposition)

Declaratory Relief

Keywords

Internet Shutdown
National Security
Public Order

Judicial Body: Constitutional Court

Court Name: Supreme Court of India

Case Number: Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1031/2019

Case Summary: The Supreme Court of India ruled that an indefinite suspension of internet services would be illegal under Indian law and that orders for internet shutdown must satisfy the tests of necessity and proportionality. The case concerned the internet and movement restrictions imposed in the Jammu and Kashmir region in India on August 4, 2019, in the name of protecting public order. In the end, however, the Court did not lift the internet restrictions and instead, it directed the government to review the shutdown orders against the tests outlined in its judgment and lift those that were not necessary or did not have a temporal limit. The Court reiterated that freedom of expression online enjoyed Constitutional protection, but could be restricted in the name of national security. The Court held that though the Government was empowered to impose a complete internet shutdown, any order(s) imposing such restrictions had to be made public and was subject to judicial review.

Case Significance: The decision establishes a binding or persuasive precedent within its jurisdiction.

Related Caselaw (self)

Bhasin v. Union of India
Dhirendra Singh Rajpurohit v. State of Rajasthan
Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India

Source Name and URL: Global Freedom of Expression

Notes: The decision was given by a three-judge bench of the Indian Supreme Court. Therefore, it establishes a binding precedent on all Courts within, unless overruled by a larger bench of the Supreme Court.

Documents principaux

1580301349938n29y644e8ii.pdf
English
Télécharger Vue

Pas de références

References are parts of this document related with other documents and entities.

Country1
- Country1
Aucune étiquettes4
- Case Law3
- Analysis1
Related Case Law24
- Case Law24

Create Reference

Sélectionner le type de relation

Original Law Cited
Related Translation
Related Media Source
Country
Related Law
Related Regulations
Related Secondary Law
Related Amendments
Related Draft Amendments
Related Case Law
Related Analysis

Astuces de recherche

Ajouter des entités / documents

Astuces de recherche

Notifications

You're all caught up

New activity will show up here.