Price v. City of N.Y.
39
40
15 Civ. 5871 (KPF) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 25, 2018)
hours, and with the prisoner outside in the
Alabama summer sun without a shirt, water, or
bathroom breaks. The Supreme Court held that
state prison regulations and a report of the U.S.
Department of Justice that criticized the "hitching
post" practice — in addition to federal appellate
authority addressing similar, but by no means
identical situations — were sufficient to clearly
establish the law and put the guards on notice that
their conduct was unlawful. Id. at 741-42. The
Court explained that "officials can still be on
notice that their conduct violates established law
even in novel factual circumstances." Id. at 741;
see *39 also United States v. Lanier, 520 U.S. 259,
271 (1997) ("There has never been ... a section
1983 case accusing welfare officials of selling
foster children into slavery; it does not follow that
if such a case arose, the officials would be
immune from damages [or criminal] liability."
(alteration in original) (citation omitted)). In so
doing, the Supreme Court rejected the Eleventh
Circuit's requirement that, for qualified immunity
purposes, the previous cases holding the conduct
to be unlawful must be "materially similar" to the
case at bar, Hope, 536 U.S. at 739, and cautioned
against "the danger of a rigid overreliance on
factual similarity," id. at 742. Instead, the Supreme
Court held that the "salient question" is whether
the state of the law at the time of the subject
incident gave public officials "fair warning" that
the conduct was unlawful. Id. at 741.
see Tolan v. Cotton, 134 S. Ct. 1861, 1866 (2014),
and none has cited its "novel circumstances"
holding in almost nine years, see Safford Unified
Sch. Dist. No. 1 v. Redding, 557 U.S. 364, 377-78
(2009).
The Supreme Court has never overruled Hope, but
its retreat from that decision is palpable.16 Two
where the officer was not found to have
years after Hope was decided, the Supreme Court
characterized that case as standing for the narrow
proposition that the absence of federal appellate
authority supporting a claim is not fatal in cases
where the *40 constitutional violation is
"obvious." See Brosseau v. Haugen, 543 U.S. 194,
199 (2004) (per curiam). And despite the wave of
Supreme Court cases addressing (and granting)
qualified immunity in recent years, no Supreme
Court majority has cited Hope in the qualified
immunity context for approximately four years,
numbers omitted)).
16 Academic
literature
reflects
this
assessment. See, e.g., Karen Blum et al.,
Qualified Immunity Developments: Not
Much Hope Left for Plaintiffs, 29 Touro L.
Rev. 633, 654 (2013) ("The Court's
language in Hope is clearly more 'plaintifffriendly,' but since that decision, the 'fair
warning'
formula
has
been
virtually
ignored by the Supreme Court." (citation
omitted));
Daniel
K.
Siegel,
Clearly
Established Enough: The Fourth Circuit's
New Approach to Qualified Immunity in
Bellotte v. Edwards, 90 N.C. L. Rev. 1241,
1252 (May 2012) (discussing the modern
trend among the circuits to require a case
on point for law to be clearly established);
see also Tahir Duckett, Unreasonably
Immune: Rethinking Qualified Immunity in
Fourth Amendment Excessive Force Cases,
53 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 409, 429 (Spring
2016) ("[Hope] applies only to actions that
'obviously run afoul of the law,' and it has
rarely been applied. Only once has a
Supreme Court Justice applied [Hope] to
conclude that an officer was put on notice
in novel factual circumstances, and it was
in a dissent. And only once has the
Supreme Court applied [Hope] to a case
qualified
immunity."
(footnote
call
In this action, Plaintiff argues that Brooks and Obe
are not entitled to qualified immunity because,
generally speaking, government officials should
know that viewpoint discrimination is unlawful in
any forum. (Pl. Opp. 13). But the Supreme Court
has repeatedly instructed lower courts "not to
define clearly established law at a high level of
generality." Kisela, 138 S. Ct. at 1152 (citations
and quotation marks omitted); see also White v.
Pauly, 137 S. Ct. 548, 552 (2017); Plumhoff, 134
19
Sélectionner le paragraphe cible3
Se connecter à un paragraphe
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Ajouter à la table des matières