Précédent 10 / 10 Next

En Santiago, a veintiséis de febrero de dos mil veintiuno, se incluyó en el Estado Diario la resolución precedente. Este documento tiene firma electrónica y su original puede ser validado en http://verificadoc.pjud.cl o en la tramitación de la causa. En aquellos documentos en que se visualiza la hora, esta corresponde al horario establecido para Chile Continental. XSWLTMLRWD

Sélectionner le paragraphe cible3

● ● ●

Maureira Álvarez v. Google

Case Law

Country

Chile

Country Location

Latitude: -33.37862595454361

Longitude: -70.68408456156871

Country Location (Lié Case Law): Chile

Decision Date: 25 juin 2021

Case Status: Affaire Résolue

Case Outcome (Procedural)

Reversed Lower Court

Keywords

Data Protection and Retention
Defamation / Reputation
Digital Rights
Freedom of Press
Privacy
Right to be Forgotten

Judicial Body: Suprême (cour d'appel de dernière instance)

Court Name: Supreme Court of Chile

Case Number: Rol N°140.332-2020

Case Summary: The Supreme Court of Chile partially revoked a ruling of the Court of Appeals of Concepción that rejected a writ for protection filed by Maureira Álvarez, a former public official, against media outlets for maintaining internet-based publications connected to a criminal investigation into his alleged role in the embezzlement of public funds. While the veracity of the events were agreed upon, Mr. Álvarez argued that the charges had been dismissed and that that the permanence of incomplete information online violated his right to privacy and honor and submitted that the latter rights should prevail over freedom of expression. The Court observed that despite the passage of time and the dismissal of the charges, the information maintained public relevance since it concerned allegations of corruption against a public official in his professional capacity. As Chilean law does not recognize the so-called “right to be forgotten,” the Supreme Court weighed the right to access information against the right to private life and honor to hold that the media outlets had violated the Mr. Álvarez’s right to honor by failing to include the definitive dismissal of the charges against him. Hence, the Court further ordered the media outlets to update their posts to include a link to the full text of the judgment dismissing the charges against Mr. Álvarez.

Case Significance: The decision expanded Freedom of Expression since the Court ordered the media outlets to update the news report to include a link to a Court of Appeals’ ruling, thereby providing the complete access to information to the users/ public. Freedom of speech also encompasses the right to information which is true and unaltered. By directing the Respondents to make complete disclosure with respect to the outcome of Court of Appeals, the decision enforces and expands the right to free speech in its true sense. Another positive aspect lies in the Court’s decision that the so-called right to be forgotten must prioritize the protection of the right to information when the disclosure of facts is relevant to the public interest.

The decision establishes a binding or persuasive precedent within its jurisdiction.

Related Law

Constitución

Source Name and URL: Global Freedom of Expression

Collection

Columbia

Date Updated: 3 juil. 2024

Documents principaux

Supreme Court Judgment (Spanish)
Spanish
Télécharger Vue

CYRILLA: Global Digital Rights Law

Sélectionner le paragraphe cible3

Maureira Álvarez v. Google

Documents principaux

Notifications