Case 1:16-cv-00540-AJT-MSN Document 37 Filed 07/28/17 Page 8 of 20 PageID# 3264 Defendant further alleges that on March 14, 2016, at a public LCSB meeting, a sheriff’s officer was present to provide security at the meeting. When Davison began criticizing Defendants Rose and Hornberger, Defendant Rose demanded that the sheriff’s officer remove Davison from the premises. The officer spoke to Davison, after which he refused to make Davison leave and dismissed Rose’s demand as frivolous. AC ¶ 30p. Defendant Rose had also previously reported to the Sheriff’s Office that Davison had been harassing her and threatening her family, a complaint which the Sheriff’s Office had investigated and found to be “unfounded and frivolous.” Id. ¶ 30n-o. On March 29, 2016, during another LCSB meeting, Defendant Rose said, “[Y]ou guys cheer for someone who makes my family fear their safety. . . . I have to show my kids a picture of speaker number two [Davison].” Id. ¶ 198. She then ended her remarks by telling the audience, “[Y]ou guys are disgusting.” Id. On June 14, 2016, the No Trespass Letter expired, and on June 15, 2016, Davison entered Seldens Landing and distributed presents to his children’s teachers without incident. Principal Stephens and the assistant principal were subsequently reassigned to other schools, and “Davison had no expectations that another no-trespass would be issued or that [the new] Principal Brazina would take retaliatory actions similar to that of Principal Stephens.” Id. ¶ 40. On July 8, 2016, this Court ordered that the present case be stayed pending resolution of the then-pending Loudoun County Circuit Court action and that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss be denied without prejudice. [Doc. No. 11]. On August 5, 2016, the Loudoun County Circuit dismissed Plaintiff’s case with prejudice. See Defs.’ Mem. Supp., Ex. 60 (“Order on Petition for Judicial Review”). Plaintiff represented himself pro se in the state court matter and signed the court’s order “SEEN AND Agreed.” Id. 8