-11“Unauthorized access to computer by telecommunications (1) Any person who, by telecommunication, knowingly causes a computer to perform any function to obtain unauthorized access to any program or data held in a computer commits an offence and is liable on conviction to a fine… (2) For the purposes of subsection (1)— … (b) 24. access of any kind by a person to any program or data held in a computer is unauthorized if he is not entitled to control access of the kind in question to the program or data held in the computer and— (i) he has not been authorized to obtain access of the kind in question to the program or data held in the computer by any person who is so entitled; (ii) he does not believe that he has been so authorized; and (iii) he does not believe that he would have been so authorized if he had applied for the appropriate authority.”9 The Computer Crimes Ordinance No 23 of 1993 amended s 59 of the Crimes Ordinance (Cap 200), which is an interpretive provision for Part VIII relating to “Criminal Damage to Property”. The relevant parts of the new s 59(1) and (1A) were: “(1) In this Part, property means: … 9 Subsections (3) and (4) of the new s 27A are not material for present purposes.