52 the prosecution will not destroy the prosecution case totally. In the cross examination the defense tried to establish that P.W. 5 is not well conversant with English language but the exact degree of his knowledge on English language was not clear from the trend of cross examination and on the contrary the P.W. 18 the I.O. of this case has emphatically stated that P.W. 5 knew English which means that P.W. 5 do has knowledge in English language. So, it appears before this court now at this point from the seized documents (exhibits 10, 13/3, 14/2, 15/2 and 16/2) that the accused Animesh Boxi is a student of Budge Budge Institute of Technology and there is nothing in the cross examinations of P.W. 5 that Animesh Boxi is not the student of Budge Budge Institute of Technology and these exhibits contained the handwriting and signature of accused Animesh Boxi. P.W. 5 in the only witness from Budge Institute of Technology and on careful perusal of the cross examination of P.W. 5 there is nothing that Animesh Boxi is not the student of Budge Budge Institute of Technology. The Ld. Lawyer for the accused at the time of argument submitted that as per The West Bengal University of Technology Act, 2000 the Registrar cannot certify the documents of the candidates nor can send any documents of any candidates. Be it mention herein that regarding this no question has been put to P.W. 5 and now at the time of argument taking this plea is not justified as to whether The West Bengal University of Technology Act, 2000 is applicable here or not. P.W. 18 in his evidence stated that in exhibit 10 he had encircled and marked I (marked by this court as exhibit 10/6), in exhibit 13/3 he had encircles and marked exhibits J and J1 (marked by this court as exhibits 13/12 and 13/13), in exhibit 14/2 he had marked exhibit K (marked by this court as exhibit 14/7), in exhibit 15/2 he had marked exhibit L (marked by this court as exhibit 15/7) and in exhibit 16/7 he had marked exhibit M (marked by this court as exhibit 16/7). It has been further stated by P.W. 18 that on 07/9/17 he had produced the documents (exhibits 10, 13/3, 14/2, 15/2 and 16/2) before the Ld. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purba Medinipur along with prescribed format duly filled by him under proper challan and Ld. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purba Medinipur had been pleased to forward the same and signed on all the documents, prescribed form and challan and in