68 photographs and video of victim and then Partha Pradhan handed over both the cameras to constable Krishanu Ghosh and P.W. 7 identified nine photos of victim (exhibits 22/18 to 22/26). P.W. 8 stated that on 07/8/17 Inspector Atanu Santra gave a requisition to his O/C and identified the signature and handwriting of his O/C Gopal Nath along with date and the requisition and O/C Gopal Nath endorsed constable Krishanu Ghosh and him to do the same. P.W. 8 further stated that then with video camera and with still camera in presence of Inspector Kakali madam he captured video and photography and later came to know that he had recorded video and captured photo of (victim’s name) in connection with Panskura P.S. case no. 381/17 and handed over the video camera and still camera to the constable of his cell namely Krishanu Ghosh. P.W. 8 further stated that then from the computer of the photography bureau printed the still pictures and burnt the video in a C.D. and the I.O. of this case seized those photos and the C.D. from Krishanu Ghosh and he had signed on the backside of the photos and the C.D. and P.W. 8 identified the pictures of the victim and stated that on the backside of each pictures he had signed along with date (exhibits 22 to 22/8). P.W. 8 also identified the CD which was burnt and the signature along with date into it (mat exhibit 3). P.W. 8 also identified the certificate u/s 65 B of Indian Evidence Act which had been given by Krishanu Ghosh to Inspector Atanu Santra and he had signed into it along with date (exhibits 23 and 23/1). P.W. 9 stated that on 07/8/2017 Cyber Cell Inspector Atanu Santra gave a requisition to O/C Photography Cell and the requisition was relating to taking of photographs of a victim in connection with Panskura P.S. case no. 381/17 and then his O/C Gopal Nath deputed ASI Partha Pradhan and him for taking photographs and as per direction as stated in the requisition in presence of lady Inspector Kakali Ghosh Kundu, ASI Partha Pradhan captured video and pictures of the victim and handed the video camera and still camera which contained the captured video and pictures of the victim to him and then from the official computer P.W. 9 printed out nine photos of the victim and burnt the video in a CD and then he handed over the said nine photographs, the CD and the certificate u/s 65 B of Indian Evidence Act, to Inspector Atanu Santra who seizure it and he had