50 09/8/17 and all the seizure witnesses and Brajendra Gupta corroborated with each other and P.W. 5, P.W. 11 and P.W. 16 identified their signatures on this seizure list, seizure list and seized articles. There is nothing in the cross examination of P.W. 18 regarding the seizure list and the seized articles and the seizure list had been signed by the witnesses who identified their signatures and also in the seized articles and the I.O. also put his endorsement that he had seized the articles in connection with this case. This court further finds that P.W. 5 is totally an independent witness and is not at all connected with any police office or CID, West Bengal. There is also an admission from the side of the accused that the exhibit 9/4 is proper when P.W. 11 in his cross examination stated that “It is a fact that nothing had been seized from Tapas Satapathi on that day. The articles as mentioned in the seizure list dated 09/8/17 had been seized from Development manager Brajendra Gupta.” P.W. 5 in his evidence further stated that on 04/9/2017 he had produced original answer paper of second Internal exam of Animesh Boxi, original membership form of Central Library of Budge Budge Institute of Technology of Animesh Boxi, original book bank card of Budge Budge Institute of Technology of Animesh Boxi, book card vide no. 12049 of Budge Budge Institute of Technology of Animesh Boxi and a forwarding letter dated 04/9/2017 sent to the I.O. of this case by Tapas Satapathi and he was authorised to do so and identified all these articles before this court. P.W. 5 stated further that the original answer paper of second Internal examination of Animesh Boxi (exhibit 13/3) contained six pages and stated that he put his signatures in two pages along with date 04/9/2017 (exhibits 13 and 13/1) out of six pages and a certificate had been given by Tapas Satapathi in the last page duly signed by Tapas Satapathi. On perusal of exhibit 13/3 this court finds that P.W. 11 and P.W. 16 signed into it along with date. At the time of seizure P.W. 18 also signed into it along with endorsement and date. Similarly, this court on perusal of the exhibits 14/2, 15/2 and 16/2 finds that P.W. 5 had produced these documents and also signed into it and identified the certificate and signatures of Tapas Satapati. By scanning the evidence of P.W. 5 this court finds it had been filled up by Animesh Boxi. Both the seizure witnesses P.W. 11 and P.W. 16 stated that they had signed along with date into the seized articles. The second I.O. of this case P.W. 18 also stated that at