86 investigation is admissible.” and this court finds that these citations are applicable in this case. In this present case exhibit 36/1 i.e. the seizure list dated 21/7/2017 proves the fact that the seizure was made after been led, shown, brought out, identified and produced by the accused which is duly proved by the deposition of P.W. 17 in his examination in chief, when he stated - “Then I interrogated Animesh Boxi and he confessed that he had got the laptop and the mobile phone with sim card through which he had uploaded the photos and videos and he had got the said laptop and the mobile phone at home and he could hand over the same to us”. On perusal of exhibit 53 this court finds that this court finds that it had been duly forwarded by Ld. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purba Medinipur and in serial no. 1 the mobile phone with the same IMEI numbers along with two sim cards and SD card which are mentioned in exhibit 36/1 and seized from accused Animesh Boxi. This court further finds from exhibit 53 that it was asked whether through Exhibit B (which P.W. 18 had marked) was used to access the email id animeshbokshi18@gmail.com and animeshboxi19@gmail.com . Now on perusal of exhibit 41 this court finds that it has been stated in the report that “Synchronized email account as on dated 21/7/2017 at 1:36 am and 21/7/2017 at 1:35 animeshbokshi18@gmail.com and am pertaining to email id animeshboxi19@gmail.com on Google account could be found in the mobile phone (mat exhibit 8) and screen shot was also annexed with the report. From exhibit 41 this court further finds regarding device information the IMEI number 358960061307271. Ld. Special PP at the time of argument relied a citation reported in K. Ramajayam v Inspector of Police 2016 Cr LJ 1542 (Mad) where it was held that “it is axiomatic that the opinion of an expert, which is relevant under sec. 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, when accepted by the court graduates into the opinion of the court” and argued that here the expert opinion of hand writing expert and CFSL experts. So, to hold this court finds that mat exhibit 8 was seized from the possession of the accused Animesh Boxi and from mat exhibit 8 the email address animeshbokshi18@gmail.com was accessed as per the CFSL report and this is the same email address who accused Animesh Boxi wrote by himself in his admission form (exhibit 10) and