rt failed to determine whether the DNA found at the place of liquidation was his or his n broth er's. Below the title of the text, a photo of Zoran Jotii was published, and next p la intiffs photo. to it, a Milica Voiinovid is signed as the author of the text. [end of fifth poqe] 6 It was not disputed between the litigants that the defendant Mreia za istraiivan.|e kriminala i korupcije is the publisher of the lnternet portal Krik, that the defendant Stevan Dojtinovii is the editor-in-chief of the said portal and the defendant Milica Vojinovii is a journalist of the Krik portal, at the time when the text in question was published. From the testimony of the plaintiff, it was established that he does not dispute that the defendant, Milica Vojinovii, faithfully conveyed the content of the wiretapped conversations that were heard as part of the evidentiary proceedings at the main trial, which was followed by the defendant as a journalist. The plaintiff does not know the persons whose wiretapped conversation was overheard during the criminal proceedings, nor is he in any relationship with the persons from the mobster world. Not a single criminal proceeding was conducted against him, not even in connection with the allegations from the mentioned text. "Krik" contacted the plaintiff on his official email on April 8, 2021 at 05:28 p.m. at the end of working hours, the text was published on April, 09 early in the morning and updated thereafter. The next time journalists spoke to him at 2:33 p.m., but Siven that the text had already been published, he did not want to comment on it. He was particularly influenced by the tltle ofthe text itself and the comment in the frame ofthe text that the expression "to be on the cauldron" means that a person receives money from someone, and what was published after the quote "who will kill him", tells Zoraja to Neikovii. Due to the publication of the title of the text and the journalist's comments within the text explaining the meaning of the expression "to be on the cauldron", the plaintiff felt particularly affected considering the function he performs, because the title of the text prejudges that one of the Iargest criminal groups is protected by politicians and that he is corrupt and that he protects them. Considering that he is the head of the body dealing with the suppression of organized crime in Serbia, and that he is the head of the Security lnformation Agency, as a result of the published information among his employees, his authority has been injured and the question is how he can restore it afterwards. As the text was read by a large number of people, the plaintiff had a large number of calls with various questions, and in connection with these allegations, which primarily refers to people from Kruievac, where he was born, where his family lives and who know the circumstances in that city. For the plaintiff personally, the text was devastating because he is labeled as a corrupt person. The court assessed the testimony of the plaintiff as clear, categorical and concise and ac&pted it as such. From the testimony of the defendant, Milica Vojinovii, it was established that the publication of the text in question, she attended the trial against Zoran Jotii's which wiretapped conversations were played, including the conversation of Saia accused member ofthe group, in which the name ofthe plaintiff, the director of s^ \s'5