In further cross examination he confirmed that he had not been transferred after the election. In response to how many were shortlisted he confirmed that he did not see the shortlist. PW1 maintained that the information he received was accurate because it came from someone living in the same house with the 1st Respondent. PW1 also reiterated that he was not intimidated personally by the 1st Respondent. 16. In re-examination PW1 confirmed that he had not been transferred since the election. 17. PW2 was Mr. Phiri Mclean William, a peasant farmer aged 45 years of Lwamfwe, in Chief Lukwesa’s village in Mwense District who attested that he was an election agent for the Petitioner. His evidence was that in executing his role of mobilizing and trying to win members of the public, he came across someone who told him that he was wasting time campaigning for the Petitioner because the PF candidate had already won. Since, according to him, the statement kept on being repeated, he decided to find out the basis of these claims and did his own investigations. Consequently, he came across a document with names of Polling Agents, Polling Assistants as well as other polling staff. 18. He identified the document of interest shown to him which was in an excel document and tendered the said document as part of his evidence before Court as “CKllfeJ” and “CKll(f)”. 19. PW2 testified that he found the document on a certain person’s computer that he had already obtained through other sources. After confirming with a friend from ECZ that the selection J12

Select target paragraph3

Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents