servants. In support of this allegation the Petitioner exhibited “CK10”. 8. The Petitioner further presented the preferred list of electoral officials namely Presiding Officers, Assistant Presiding Officers and excel document marked as Polling Assistants in an “CKll”(e) and (f). aforementioned exhibit With reference to the assertion that the election officials frustrated the work of the Petitioner and his agents by forbidding them from entering the polling station or demanding that they leave, the Petitioner exhibited “CK12”as a list of his registered agents. 9. He filed a further affidavit in support of the Petition dated 20th September 2021 deposing that he did call some of the names on the list of pre-selected ECZ polling officials to confirm the suspected election malpractice and exhibited a ZICTA report marked “CK13”. The Petitioner also produced the registration numbers of the motor vehicles which he alleged came to his residence collectively exhibited as “CK14”. 10. The Petitioner deposed that as a result of the aforementioned malpractices committed by the 1st Respondent and the unprofessional conduct of the 2nd Respondent’s election officials, the Petitioner was disadvantaged as the playing field was not levelled. He further deposed that by reason of the aforesaid, the Petitioner was also disadvantaged because the electorate were unduly coerced thus robbing the Petitioner of his intended votes. The Petitioner added that the illegal practices, acts of intimidation and invasion of his privacy by the 1st Respondent gravely affected J9