由此 - 11 - A B C 27. The Magistrate had examined the facts and did not err by finding that solicitation had occurred at the place described in the charge. A B C Nor did he construe incorrectly as solicitation the conversation which took D place between PW2 and the Appellant at the meeting place. E E 28. F G D The Magistrate analysed the evidence in the light of the F authorities and gave himself appropriate directions. There is no basis for interfering with his decision to convict and accordingly, this appeal against G conviction is dismissed. H H I I J J K K L (C-M Beeson) Judge of the Court of First Instance L M M N Ms Lily Ho May-yu, Senior Public Prosecutor of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent O Mr Albert Poon, instructed by Messrs W K To & Co, for the Appellant N O P P Q Q R R S S T T U U V V