Price v. City of N.Y. 55 15 Civ. 5871 (KPF) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 25, 2018) 126-27 (holding that a plaintiff lacked standing to sue the City of New York for harms allegedly caused by the MTA). Plaintiff therefore fails to state a Monell claim against the City of New York related to her arrest by MTA officers. (ii) false arrest, against Corrado, Cruz, and Staines in their individual capacities; (iii) false arrest, excessive force, and malicious prosecution, against MTA Officer John Doe and MTA Officer Jane Doe in their individual capacities. CONCLUSION The parties are ordered to meet and confer and propose a discovery schedule to the Court, using the Court's case management plan, on or before July 20, 2018. For the reasons stated above, the Court: (i) DENIES the motion to dismiss the § 1983 malicious prosecution claim against the City of New York and Simmons; (ii) GRANTS the motion to dismiss the § 1983 First Amendment claims against Brooks, Obe, and Pierre-Louis in their individual capacities on the basis of qualified immunity, and the claims against the City of New York — *55 along with Brooks, Obe, and PierreLouis in their official capacities — for failure to state a claim; (iii) GRANTS the City Defendants' motion to dismiss the substantive due process claims against them, for failure to state a claim; and (iv) GRANTS the City's motion to dismiss the Monell claim related to the false arrest and malicious prosecution by MTA officers. The following § 1983 claims remain: (i) malicious prosecution, against Simmons in her individual and official capacities, and the City of New York; The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at docket entry 107. SO ORDERED. Dated: June 25, 2018 New York, New York /s/_________ KATHERINE POLK FAILLA United States District Judge Sent by First Class Mail to: Kelly Price 534 W. 187th Street, Apt. #7 New York, NY 10033 26

Select target paragraph3

Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents