- 3 - A B C A (“Appeal”), and Ms Chow would like to be heard on the Appeal. Indeed, she has attempted to file a Respondent’s Notice in the Appeal. The desire B C to participate in the Appeal gave rise to this application. D E D The nomenclature used in the Decision is adopted for the 5. E present purpose. F G F The relevant procedural history will be set out in detail 6. G because it reflects on the merits of this application. H H I Procedural history J 7. I On 5 June 2023, the SJ commenced these proceedings against J the Defendants, who are identified by the description: “Persons conducting K L themselves in any of the Acts prohibited under paragraph 1(a), (b), (c) or (d) of the Indorsement of Claim”. In simple terms, these are acts which K L endanger national security with the use of the Song known as “Glory to M M Hong Kong”. N N On the same day, an inter parte Summons for the Injunction 8. O P was issued. The Injunction sought to prohibit 4 Acts 2 by persons who were conducting those Acts and those who were not conducting the Acts O P but would conduct the same in the future, ie, “newcomers”3. Q Q R R S 2 3 The terms of the Injunction can be found in the Decision, [21]. Decision, [39]. S T T U U V V