Court through the Act of 2013 to show that wiretapping or intercepting calls can only be made after a due process has been followed as prescribed under the said Act and issuance of warrants by the concerned High Court. It submitted that even otherwise under the Act of 1996, the rules were to be made which included rules for interception and wiretapping calls which till todate have not been framed and the same stands admitted by the Federal Government and is reflected in the order of this Court “Bushra dated Imran Pakistan, etc. 25.06.2024 Khan Vs. in case of Federation of (W.P No.2758-2023). It was further submitted that a similar situation arose way back in 1998, which led to the judgment of the Supreme Court of Pakistan in case reported as “Mohtarama Benzair Bhutto and others Vs. President of Pakistan and others (PLD 1998 SC 388), wherein certain principles and guidelines were propounded by the Supreme Court of Pakistan for the interception of calls or wiretapping. It was further contended that the impugned notification as well as section 54 ibid is ultra vires the provisions of the Constitution, hence need to be struck down. 3. Points raised need consideration. Admit. Notice.

Select target paragraph3