FAO No. 42 of 2016. vested with the section 8(2)(c) jurisdiction read with the Federal Government 26-12-2009 to section 54 regarding the directives under (2) of the Act of 1996; referred the Authority to closure services due to national concerns; Directive policy has issued the policy directive, dated (hereinafter Directive”) issue is of the “Policy telecommunication pursuant to the said Policy under an obligation telecommunication services on the requests received from the agencies; Government has preference telecommunication of the Federal under system; for issue to enforcing licensees to orders/directions law the as section and 54 priority it is within Government to decide closing (2) in down the Federal relation to the exclusive matters the domain relating to the defence or security of Pakistan; the Policy Directive is binding upon the Authority pursuant to the Standing Operating referred to Supreme Court under Policy as Directive “SOP”); in the the case the of the Act of Authority has issued 15-02-2010 judgment of “Mustafa is not attracted uN 8(1) Procedure, dated the others “ supra section the august Karachi since the expression and ‘Federal Government’ has been expressly defined in the Act of 1996. 6. learned The been heard Government Act of 1996 Assistant at length. that to It is Attorney the case it was empowered under issue the Policy General Directive of a (hereinafter of Impex, 1996; the section and Authority is under an obligation to comply therewith. has also Federal 8 of the that the