28/09/2023, 14:44 Barilaro v Google LLC [2022] FCA 650 THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. Judgment be entered for the applicant in the sum of $715,000, inclusive of $40,000 prejudgment interest. 2. On or before 14 June 2022 the applicant and respondent file and serve any evidence and written submissions limited to three pages if he or it seeks an order in respect of costs other than that the respondent pay the applicant’s costs, and, in default of any such application, it be ordered that: 2. The respondent pay the applicant’s costs. 3. If either party makes an application pursuant to order 2: (a) on or before 21 June 2022 the opposing party file and serve any evidence and written submissions limited to three pages in response. (b) on or before 28 June 2022 the applying party file and serve any evidence and written submissions limited to one page in reply. 4. The conduct of the respondent and Jordan Shanks-Markovina in the evidence admitted at the trial and Court’s reasons for judgment delivered today be referred to the Principal Registrar to consider whether to institute proceedings against each for what appear to be serious contempts of court by bringing improper pressure on the applicant and his lawyer not to pursue this proceeding. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011. RARES J: REASONS FOR JUDGMENT Introduction [1] The matters complained of [3] Procedural history [7] Mr Barilaro’s background [12] Mr Barilaro’s experience with friendlyjordies [22] The Koalakiller 2 video [27] The bruz video [33] Mr Barilaro’s reaction to the bruz video [64] The bruzboard video [77] https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2022/2022fca0650 4/101

Select target paragraph3