J13 report “A Judge must not alter that of which he can and should iron the creases.” (a statute) is woven, but They submitted that there are no creases in Section 67 which need ironing over or on the basis of which it can be struck off for being unconstitutional. State concluded Counsel for the matters raised making it difficult to understand by the Applicants as amounting expedition, to a fishing need exactly the Applicants what from sheet where Those issues include alleged defect in the charge the Court. other criticizing by submissions their whether to refer to the Police asa the 1st Applicant’s name was misspelt; Service or a Force; etc. view However, the irrelevant to the I take matter so-called of those that has come constitute alleged breaches of Articles before issues me that is they are do not they because 11 to 26 which are the issues that are properly to be brought by way of reference in terms of Article 28 (2) of the I, therefore, Constitution. do not propose them in this in part, dealing to consider judgment. COURT In the SEAFORD with the approach ESTATES a Court particular words therein. in this judgment. One ought case, the Court was, to adopt Hence Lord Denning’s of the cannons a statute in interpreting sentiments is to so interpret the or cited earlier statute or words therein as to give effect to the governing principles embodied in the legislation.