41 license a trader to carry on his business in unfair com¬ petition with his rivals. In my view there is not in the present case any sufficient countervailing public in¬ terest to displace one's initial response to Schultz's methods of competition. In my opinion,therefore, MULLINS J was right in his conclusion that Schultz's conduct amounted to unfair competition, against which Butt was entitled to be protect¬ ed. INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT It is common cause that Butt is the "author" of the Butt-Cat hull and that he is a "qualified person" in terms of s. 3(1) of the Copyright Act, No 98 of 197 In......