Neutral Citation Number: 2023:DHC:2806 overemphasised that it has to be an in-house procedure/method to be introduced by the Companies, and we do so direct.'" (emphasis supplied) True copy of the order dated 19.09.2016 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Sabu Mathew George v Union of India (2017) 2 SCC 516(2) is annexed herewith as ANNEXURE M [Pg. 374 to 387]. 34. In the present matter, take down orders of this Hon'ble Court may specify key words such as name of the victim appearing in the impugned URL. Intermediaries must proactively thereafter take down content contained in different URLs that is similar or identical to the impugned URL, and block search results bearing such keywords, in light of Respondent No.3/ Google's keyword search policy and the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sabu Mathew George (supra).‖ Submissions on behalf of Google LLC 35. Mr. Arvind Nigam, learned Senior Counsel appearing for Google LLC and YouTube, i.e. Respondent Nos.3 and 5, has made the following submissions: a. At the outset, all possible actions have been taken by Google to ensure that the offending content does not remain on its index with re-uploads being disabled and errant channels on YouTube being removed. Google Search, the search engine of Google LCC, does not host or publish or have any control over any content, and it merely indexes content made available by third-parties on their websites/platforms. It has specifically been excluded from the Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SHAZAAD ZAKIR Signing Date:26.04.2023 17:19:50 W.P.(CRL) 1505/2021 Page 47 of 88