CYRILLA: Global Digital Rights Law

CYRILLA: Global Digital Rights Law

- مكتبة
- تسجيل الدخول

مرتبة حسب

تم إضافة التاريخ

62 العلاقات, 61 الكيانات

اختر الفقرة المستهدفة3

● ● ●

أوازي من إعداد:
CYRILLA: Global Digital Rights Law
مكتبة
تسجيل الدخول

معلومات
62العلاقات

Google Inc. v. B.R.

Case Law

نصائح البحث

بحث النص

Type something in the search box to get some results.

جدول المحتويات

لا يوجد جدول المحتويات

لا جدول محتويات الوصف

Google Inc. v. B.R.

Case Law

Country

Italy

Country Location

خط العرض: 42.82063999428387

خط الطول: 12.730955243111072

Country Location (مرتبط Case Law): Italy

Decision Date: 21 يوليو 2021

Case Status: أُغلقت / إنتهت

Case Outcome Procedural

Reversed Lower Court

Keywords

Data Protection
ISP Regulation
Privacy
Right to be forgotten

Judicial Body: المحكمة العليا (محكمة أعلي درجة)

Court Name: Italian Supreme Court

Case Number: Cass. Civ., n. 20861/2021

Case Summary: The Italian Supreme Court held that Google did not have to de-index search results of an individual as the individual had not provided details of the information he wished to be removed. After a lower court ordered Google to remove all results related to the individual as the information was no longer publicly relevant, Google had appealed to the Supreme Court. The Court acknowledged that the right to be forgotten can impose an obligation on search engines to remove information from its search results, but found that the request in this case was too generic and did not enable Google to sufficiently identify and de-reference the content which allegedly violated the individual’s right.

Case Significance: In clarifying that a request for de-referencing or deletion of content from an Internet service provider must clearly identify that content, the Supreme Court ensured that the obligation to monitor and remove content is not overly onerous.

The decision establishes a binding or persuasive precedent within its jurisdiction.

By clarifying that, when requesting the deletion or de-referencing of content from an Internet service provider, the claimant must clearly identify (possibly by providing the URLs) the content whose removal is demanded, the Court offered binding precedent concerning the procedural requirements of the request.

Related Caselaw

Google Spain SL v. Agencia Española de Protección de Datos
SABAM v. Netlog NV, Case C‑360/10
Scarlet Extended SA v. SABAM

Source Name and URL: Global Freedom of Expression

Collection

Columbia

Date Updated: 3 يوليو 2024

المستندات الأولية

Supreme Court Judgment (Italian)
Italian
تحميل عرض

لا مرجع

References are parts of this document related with other documents and entities.

Country1
- Country1
Precedent60
- Case Law60
لا تسمية1
- Secondary Source1

Create Reference

اختر نوع العلاقة

Original Law Cited
Related Translation
Related Media Source
Country
Related Law
Related Regulations
Related Secondary Law
Related Amendments
Related Draft Amendments
Related Case Law
Related Analysis

نصائح البحث

إضافة كيانات (أو إدخالات)/ مستندات

نصائح البحث

Notifications

You're all caught up

New activity will show up here.