Article 23 (Exclusion of, Challenge to, and Refrainment by Deliberators) With respect to the exclusion of, challenge to, and refrainment by a deliberator, Article 14 shall apply mutatis mutandis. In such cases, "member" shall be deemed "deliberator". Article 24 (Enactment and Proclamation of Deliberation Provisions) The Korea Communications Standards Commission shall enact and proclaim the following deliberation provisions necessary for performing duties under Article 21: 1. Provisions concerning deliberation on broadcasting under Article 33 of the Broadcasting Act; 2. Provisions concerning deliberation on information and communications, with the aim of deliberating under the subparagraphs 3 and 4 of Article 21. Article 25 (Sanctions) (1) When it is deemed that contents of broadcasting or information and communications violate deliberation provisions under Article 24, the Korea Communications Standards Commission may determine any of the following sanctions: 1. Sanctions, recommendations, or the submission of opinions under Article 100 (1) of the Broadcasting Act; 2. Refusing, suspending or restricting the handling of illegal information under Article 44-7 of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. (2) Where the Korea Communications Standards Commission intends to determine sanctions under paragraph (1) and a request for correction under subparagraph 4 of Article 21, it shall provide an opportunity for the relevant person or his/her agent to state his/her opinion in advance: Provided, That where it intends to determine a request for correction under subparagraph 4 of Article 21, it may choose not to provide an opportunity for the relevant person or his/her agent to state his/her opinion in any of the following cases: <Amended on Jan. 20, 2015> 1. Where it is necessary to make an urgent request for correction for public safety and security or welfare; 2. Where it is clearly impracticable or unnecessary to hear the opinion of the relevant person and his/her contact details are unknown; 3. Where it is clearly impracticable or unnecessary to hear the opinion of the relevant person, and a statement of opinion based on a request for correction is deemed unnecessary because the fact that is a prerequisite for the request for correction is objectively proved in accordance with the final and conclusive judgment, etc. made by a court; 4. Where the relevant person clearly expresses his/her intention of relinquishing an opportunity to state his/her opinion.