22 mobile phone and then the accused had uploaded those nude pictures of her daughter in different porn websites and he came to know about this from his bhaipo (nephew) who came to their home and told them and after hearing this her daughter was broken and came to know from his daughter as well. P.W. 2 further stated that with her daughter he went to the P.S. in the evening time of 21/7/2017 and as her daughter was broken so she dictated and he had written the complaint and it was read over to his daughter and her daughter had also seen it and then her daughter put her signature into it. P.W. 2 identified the written complaint (exhibit 1) and stated that it was written as per her daughter’s instructions and it bears the signature of her daughter and identified his signature (exhibit 1/2) on the written complaint. P.W. 2 also stated that he was examined by the police. P.W. 2 further stated that on 07/8/17 he went to CID office along with her daughter and there the mobile phone of her daughter was seized by the CID and he had signed on the seizure list and knew the contents of the seizure list and identified his signature (exhibit 4/1). P.W. 2 identified his signature on the label (mat exhibit 1/2) and the mobile phone of his daughter. P.W. 2 also stated that in the CID office women police officer examined her daughter and took her daughter’s consent for taking her pictures and then her daughter and he had given the consent to it and identified his signature (exhibit 5/1) on the paper for giving consent and also identified the signature of her daughter (exhibit 5/2). P.W. 2 identified the pictures of her daughter in exhibits 1/4, 1/5 and 1/6. P.W. 3 happens to be the constable number 573 posted at CID, Cyber Crime Cell who stated before this court that he knew the incident of 19/8/17 and on that day Barun Kumar Nayek (P.W. 11) Sub Inspector of Cyber Crime Cell downloaded the email data which had been received in the official email of CID, Cyber Crime Cell and the official email address is occyber.cid-wb@gov.in from Google and Pornhub and the case reference for which the data had been downloaded is in connection with Panskura P.S. case No. 381/17 and then the downloaded articles had been printed and Barun babu gave the said document to the I.O. of this case Atanu Santra (P.W. 18) who seized it and he was present at that time. P.W. 3 identified his signature along with date (exhibit 6) in the seizure list and he had signed into it after reading and understanding its content. P.W. 3

اختر الفقرة المستهدفة3

الاتصال بفقرة
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
أضف إلى جدول المحتويات