由此 - 43 - A B 171. It was suggested that Digital UK lost a deal with ASTRO as a result of the Article. But it is far from clear from the minutes of a 20 April C A B C 2006 meeting with ASTRO relied upon by Digital UK that it lost a joint D venture with ASTRO because of the Article. E E 172. F G D The Article was raised by Mr. Salman Iqbal of his own motion on the last day of a 4-day long conference between ASTRO and Digital UK. On 20 April 2006 (the last day of the conference) Mr. Lim of ASTRO F G observed that it was the responsibility of his company “to evaluate the H I J K proposal of joint venture”. Only at that stage did Mr. Iqbal bring up the Article. 173. H I I am not able to infer that the Article was any cause of the joint venture with ASTRO falling through, merely because the Article was J K mentioned at the conclusion of the last day of what was otherwise a L detailed examination of Digital UK’s operations by ASTRO. M M 174. N O L It was finally suggested that a possible deal with ESS/Star was lost due to the Article. Here reliance was placed on minutes of a meeting between ESS/Star and Digital UK on 25 April 2006. The minutes, however, N O suggest that ESS/Star were then only scouting out potential business P Q R S partners (including GEO, Digital UK’s chief competitor). Everything was at a preliminary stage. P Q R 175. It is true that ESS/Star brought up the Article of its own initiative in discussion with Digital UK. But I cannot deduce from that S slender evidence that the loss of the opportunity with ESS/Star was wholly T T or partly due to the Article. U U V V